Over
the past several days I had many questions on the outlook for the price
direction of the Canadian bank stocks. So here is the technical opinion based
on my work.
First,
there is great cyclic commonality among all of the big five banks and so we
have a monkey-see, monkey-do situation. Secondly all of the banks are trading
too far above their respective 50-day simple moving averages as measured in
historical terms. Third all are trading above their respective rising 200-day
simple moving average. Fourth is the peaking momentum studies and finally all
have posted recent new 52-week highs.
So
a reasonable strategy would be for long investors to reduce because the group is
likely to correct down to their respective 50-day moving averages BUT retain
some exposure as the banks will likely resume the upward trend which remains in
place as evidenced by their rising 200-day (or 40-week) moving averages along
with the recent string of new 52-week highs. The ultimate top is not yet
apparent and so the bull market in most of the financial sector remains in
place – except for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH) which closed today
at $405.00
According
to the company Fairfax
is a financial services holding company which, through its subsidiaries, is
engaged in property and casualty insurance and reinsurance and investment
management.
The
experts are divided on the outlook for FFH as published on the Stockchase.com
web site. According to Stockchase.com, “This site is used by investors to track
what stock experts say. It is useful as an online investing tool for due
diligence, and for getting a feel for how companies are thought of by
investment experts. This site should not be your only resource or reference,
but it should be one of the investing tools in your arsenal for wise investing
in the stock market.”
Some
recent opinions:
Hank
Cunningham 2013-07-17 DON’T BUY on FFH then $422.00: “How comfortable should a
person be in investing in this companies debt, dated 2020 to 2022? He would not
be very relaxed as he is not very comfortable with companies that he doesn’t
understand. He doesn’t understand their balance sheet or their strategy. It is
a fluid situation and this is a long-term corporate bond with a rating of BBB
minus, not strong credit.”
Barry
Schwartz 2013-10-09 BUY on FFH then $435.50. “He owns a series of rate reset
shares. If they are trading below $25
then the market thinks they won’t be called.
They are fairly illiquid. They
have not recovered since the announcement of tapering and may be a good
investment.”
Don
Vialoux 2013-10-11 BUY on FFH then $440.60. “One of the more volatile financial
services company in Canada.
Chart shows a nice breakout over a long period of time, which is very positive.
Trading above its 20 day moving average and is outperforming the TSE. This
gives it a technical score of 3. Looks very interesting.
Cunningham
is a fixed income guy who does not do technicals. Schwartz is a fundamental
value guy who hates technicals and Vialoux is clearly voicing a technical opinion.
When I look at chart #1 which is a weekly plot of FFH
displaying poor relative strength vs. its peers the TSX Financial index – in this
case the clone XFN, Note the 2+ years of relative under perform. Clearly FFH
has missed the greatest financial bull since the 1990’s. The recent collapse is
very negative – see the money flow on chart #2
When I look at chart #2 which
is a monthly plot, I see a string of cycle magnitude failures from 2009 and
recent declining money flow numbers. I think Cunningham has made the correct
call on this one.