If
you're ever lost and on a deserted road without a cell phone, grab paper and
pen and begin an Elliott Wave count. Within seconds, a stranger will appear to
correct your wave count. Ask this guy for a ride.
The
problem has always been where to begin the wave count.
Students
of Elliott Wave will easily recognize the three advances (impulse waves) that
are interrupted by two corrections (waves) to be a perfect five-wave Elliott
bull market. The completed bull is then followed by a three wave A-B-C bear
phase.. Keep in mind cycle analysts have observed that, for the most part, bull
markets tend to persist for about 36 to 42 months and will contain three
separate and distinct advances or “up legs” which ties into the three impulse
Elliott Wave theory.
Our
chart spanning about 200 weeks of the S&P/TSX composite index appears to
display a complete Elliott Wave bull and bear phase if we begin the wave count
from the lows of March 2009. The first advance or wave (1) ran from the March
2009 low to the peak of mid-June. The first short corrective wave bottomed at
(2) in July 2009. The second advance or wave (3) ran from the mid July 2009 low
(2) to the April 2010 peak at (3). The second corrective wave (4) was longer
the corrective wave (2) and bottomed in July 2010. The final advance or wave
(5) ran from the July 2010 low at (4) to the final peak in April 2011 at (5).
The
bear phase is usually an A-B-C correction with time duration shorter than the
bull phase. The first, or A, down wave is a corrective wave that “comes out of
nowhere” and is initially thought to be a buying opportunity. In the example of
the TSX composite, the A down wave began from a price peak in early March 2011
and ended in early October 2011 for a loss of about 3,400 points or a 50%
retracement of the 2009 – 2011 bull phase.
The
subsequent rebound wave B ran from the lows of October 2011 and peaked in March
2012 retracing about 50 per cent of the losses sustained in wave A. During the
recovery wave B, many investors are still bullish because they still regard the
A down wave low to be a buying opportunity.
The
final C down wave can take many forms. It can be a sudden and sharp decline
accompanied by fear, confusion and panic, which is typical of a C wave bottom
or it could be shallow and not violate the lows of the A wave. In any event investor
temperament will change from bullish to bearish and may cause investors to
stampede out of risky assets such as cyclical stocks and into safe assets such
as utilities and telecoms. If this is a C wave bottom, then we start into a new
Elliott 1-2-3-4-5 wave advance that should run through 2013.
3 comments:
How can this elliott wave thing work. It's like seeing images of the virgin mary in your cereal bowl in the morning.
Hello dh12
If you see images of the Virgin Mary in your cereal bowl in the morning you should cut back on your medication.
Anyway - if you have better analysis please share it with us
Bill Carrigan
Hi Bill,
I know how much you love divergence.
http://www.raretimestrader.com/what-is-the-best-breadth-indicator-for-the-br
The article above illustrates long term negative divergence between the NASDAQ and the NASDAQ New Highs/New Lows line. The author shows how the same divergence was present at the 2000 market top. He also notes that no such divergence exists in the NYSE AD line nor NYSE New Highs/New Lows line and that these indicators are in fact bullish as you have also indicated.
If you bring up a long term chart of the NASDAQ Advance/Decline line it appears to be in perpetual decline since the mid 90s. It has recently broken to new lows once again.
What do you think of the argument the author is making regarding the NASDAQ New Highs/New Lows being a more "important" indicator? Or is these NASDAQ indicators simply not that reliable due to the more relaxed listing requirements for "speculative start-ups" unlike the NYSE?
Shawn
Post a Comment