On
my last post I suggested market timing implies that investors should dump their
investments when they get a “sell” signal from some seasonal or black box
strategy and then buy them back when a “buy” signal is generated. Caveat: No
timing model works all the time. No market timing model should ever be used by
investors to jump in and out of the stock market. A prudent investor should never
sell a good investment based on any timing model but rather to maybe tone down
the risk on a sell signal and than take on a little more risk when a buy signal
is generated. Risk in the portfolio could be too much sector concentration or too
much leverage or too little diversification.
Over
the next few weeks I will illustrate some simple market timing models that I use
with some degree of success.
This
simple timing model is 30 week price channel with the upper band being the
highest moving high over the past 30-weeks and the lower band is the lowest moving
low over the past 30-weeks, This model assumes that a bull market is
technically a series of higher highs and higher lows with the rising peaks and
troughs usually about twenty six weeks or less apart. In other words a bull
needs to make a series of new highs every six months and a bear market will
usually do the opposite and make a series of new lows every six months.
Today’s
chart displays a 30-week price channel on the S&P500 – the model runs from
March 1990 to date and has generated 6 signals to date with the last being a “buy”
on March 16, 2012 @1404 on the index.. It bats 100% on the long trades and 67%
on the sell trades. A very simple tool, I have used it for years so enjoy.
4 comments:
Bill,
is that intra-week violation that triggers or weekly closes?
On an aside 75-week SMA of S&P has been a great demarker of Bulls and bears for a long time
Interesting that your channels (looks like Donchian) is half of that length -- is that a coincidence?
I just checked the same setup on Gold
there has not been a sell signal since 2008 - vow!
Hello Piazzi
I only use the week-end for signals - never intra-week
Bill C
Bill,
Interesting. Can you please explain what constitutes a 'violation'?
I am having trouble seeing it on the chart.
Thanks
Post a Comment